by Jacob Guettler and Sam Smith
Monday
This
week marked an entire month that our crew has been working together on various
land stewardship projects! It also
marked another five days of rain, thunderstorms, and more rain. We began the week in the office, finishing a
report for NRCS about our last project at the Pomainville site in West Rutland. After breaking for lunch in a brief period of
sunshine, we gathered as a group in the Aiken lounge to discuss at length our
next project. This involved
completing a very rapid ecological assessment of a privately owned piece of land in order to determine if the land holds ecological
value. This project was quite different
from our previous assessments for several reasons. First and foremost, we had to consider that only one day was allotted to determine
ecological value! How do you even define
ecological value? Fortunately we had an extensive
discussion about our plan of action so that we were prepared Tuesday for a full
day of field work.
Tuesday
Arriving at the site early for our swift
assessment of the property, we split up into four teams based on topographic
features to comb the entire site. Two
groups walked each side of the river, one group inventoried the open fields,
and one group tackled the forested section. We all spent the day sweating profusely in
the humid air, swatting at the endless number of mosquitoes and wishing
we could swim in the river, which was full of sediment from recent heavy rains.
As each group surveyed their piece of the parcel, they took note of the plant and
wildlife species present (or audible), unique topographic features, signs of
human use, and soil properties.
Together, these observations were used to extrapolate what natural
community types were present on the site.
Natural community classification was used to understand what is
on the landscape and to make predictions about future habitat conditions. By
categorizing the landscape in terms of natural communities, we are able to
understand species composition and infer distribution within a given area.
Each group had their own tale to
tell about the natural and human features of the landscape that they
observed.
Julie "driving" an old tractor
Wed
After our quick work out in the
field, it was back to the office to crank out another report of
our findings. We spent the day comparing
notes, reading through the various natural community classifications in Wetland,
Woodland, Wildland by Elizabeth Thompson and Eric Sorenson, creating maps
of our findings, and playing jokes on each other in Google Docs (it’s the small
things in life after all).
Thursday
After quickly finishing our report for the
property, we prepared ourselves for a day of service work. Our two
tasks: 1. Weed the experimental plots at the US Forest Service Center, 2.
Beautify the solarium at the UVM Aiken Center. We have weeded at the US Forest
Service before and today wasn’t
much different…except some of the weeds were GINORMOUS! It had been a couple
weeks since we had last weeded and some of the plots clearly showed that. The
trees were also growing and it was fascinating seeing the differences between
plots in tree size and weed size.
Finally, we drove back to our home-base at the
UVM Aiken Center. In order to give back to the Rubenstein School of
Environmental Science and Natural Resources (Aiken Center) we helped beautify the solarium
(a relaxing space filled with plants inside the entrance to the building). We
divided up into two teams. One group helped fix the wetland display by moving
the pools into proper places, so that the water would flow more easily. The
second group repotted plants to be hung as a green wall at a later date. We
were glad to have been of assistance helping to make the Aiken Center’s
solarium an enjoyable place to sit back and relax.
Maria hard at work designing and beautifying plans for a green wall in the solarium
Analyzing the water flow situation between the
ponds in the wetland display
Friday
We met with Ralph Tursini, a forester, at the
UVM ropes course to build a bridge. This was a service project for the UVM
ropes course, thanking them for giving us a fun time, and bringing us closer
together after our first week with each other. Ralph taught us some of the
basic proper techniques necessary to fell a tree, in this case a hemlock snag.
Ralph helped us out by using a chainsaw to cut down the snag and remove excess
branches. We then worked together as a team to cut into the log, using an ax
and mallet, in order to create a flat walking surface for the bridge. It was
slow going at first, but then we picked up the pace thanks to Ralph and his
chainsaw.
At this point, our plan from the previous day
came into play. Ralph helped us cut down a tree with the perfect diameter, and smooth
bark, for rolling logs. After tying several timber-hitch knots around out newly
formed bridge, we began pulling the tree over the rolling logs. It was a wild
journey to the stream where the bridge was to be placed. Rolling logs were
moving all over the place and the bridge often seemed to have a mind of its
own. By the time we were done we had moving a tree down to an art. With some
fancy maneuvering and the placement of two base points in the muddy stream
bank, our bridge was complete and ready for use. All in all, we made quick work
of the tree and had a great time seeing our plan and bridge come to life.
Raplh Tursini removing branches from the hemlock
tree used for our bridge at the UVM ropes course
The team on the finished product!